The article considers the problem of predicting the nature of the inflow of Achimov reservoirs in the northern part of Western Siberia. The solution of the problem is complicated by a number of factors: geological heterogeneity, low porosity and permeability, variability and low mineralization of formation waters, the presence of abnormally high formation pressure and high formation temperatures. The paper considers the results of special laboratory experiments on electrical, capillary, filtration characteristics of rocks and their comparison with the results of geophysical well logging. The nature of changes in porosity and saturation parameters depending on the mineralization of formation water under atmospheric and reservoir conditions was established. Correlations between critical water saturation values and the water and oil content in the reservoir were established in order to determine the nature of rock saturation, taking into account the intervals of the sub-reservoir by combining capillary, electrical and filtration models. Based on the obtained results, a method for determining the water saturation coefficient of rocks using the Dakhnov-Archie model and a method for verifying formation water mineralization over a field area under conditions of its variability were improved. A method for determining the saturation nature of reservoirs, taking into account sub-reservoir intervals, was also refined. Validation of the proposed method demonstrated a significant increase in the reliability of initial water cut prediction based on well logging data.
References
1. Zhizhimontov I.N., Makhmutov I.R., Yevdoshchuk A.A., Smirnova E.V., Heterogeneous saturation cause analysis during petrophysical modeling of low permeability Achimov deposits (In Russ.), Neftyanoye khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 2022, no. 3, pp. 30–35, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2022-3-30-35
2. Makhmutov I.R., Turenko S.K., Study of distribution patterns of oil- and water-saturated reservoirs in a section of the Achimov formation (In Russ.), Aktual′nyye problemy nefti i gaza, 2025, V. 16, no. 2, pp. 204–220, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29222/ipng.2078-5712.2025.11
3. Doroginitskaya L.M., Kolichestvennaya otsenka dobyvnykh kharakteristik kollektorov nefti i gaza po petrofizicheskim dannym i materialam GIS (Quantitative assessment of production characteristics of oil and gas reservoirs based on petrophysical data and well logging materials), Tomsk: Publ. of TPU, 2007, 276 p.
4. Makhmutov I.R., Tarandyuk M.S., Turenko S.K., Development of a petrophysical model of the Achimov deposits based on a two-level lithophysical typing of rocks
(In Russ.), Nedropol′zovaniye XXI vek, 2025, no. 5-6 (109), pp. 16-25.
5. Mukhidinov SH.V., Belyakov E.O., Determination of mobile water in reservoirs of Achimov thickness (In Russ.), PROneft′. Professional′no o nefti = PROneft. Professionally about Oil, 2020, no. 4(18), pp. 34–39, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S2587739920040047
6. Rodivilov D.B., Kantemirov YU.D., Makhmutov I.R., Akin′shin A.V., Prakticheskoye rukovodstvo po petrofizicheskomu modelirovaniyu neftegazonasyshchennosti
(A practical guide to petrophysical modeling of oil and gas saturation), Tyumen: Ekspress Publ., 2023, 144 p., DOI: https://doi.org/10.54744/TNSC.2023.62.68.001
7. Dakhnov V.N., Interpretatsiya karotazhnykh diagramm (Interpretation of well logs), Moscow – Leningrad: Gostoptekhizdat Publ., 1941, 496 p.
8. McPhee C., Reed J., Zubizarreta I., Core analysis: A best practice guide, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2015, 829 p.
9. Rodivilov D.B., Salomatin E.N., Shul′ga R.S., Modification of the Dakhnov–Archie electrical model with successive changes in the mineralization of pore waters under thermobaric conditions (In Russ.) PROneft′. Professional′no o nefti = PROneft. Professionally about Oil, 2025, V. 10, no. 3(37), pp. 60–67,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-10-3-60-67
10. Waxman M.H., Smits L.J., Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 1968, no. 8, pp. 107–122, DOI: http://doi.org/10.2118/1863-A
11. Vendel’shteyn B.Yu., Ellanskiy M.M., Effect of rock adsorption properties on the dependence of relative resistance on porosity coefficient (In Russ.), Prikladnaya geofizika, 1964, V. 40, pp. 181–193.
12. Pickett G.R., Pattern recognition as a means of formation evaluation, The Log Analyst, 1973, V. 14, no. 4, pp. 3–11.