Probabilistic assessment of the resource base occupies a central place in the decision-making process at the stages of prospecting and exploration of hydrocarbon deposits. The accuracy of the results of such an assessment directly correlates with the reliability of identifying uncertainty intervals for the calculation parameters and the probability of discovering new deposits, and also affects the determination of the further program of geological exploration work and the calculation of predicted production profiles. In addition to the standard procedures for geological uncertainties evaluation, for example structural framework construction errors (stratigraphic boundaries positions) and fluid contacts, 2D/3D geological models multivariate calculations require accounting variation of lithological boundaries as well as setting trends based on conceptual understanding. This article presents approaches to net pay volume multivariate modeling of lithologically screened deposits confined to the Lower Cretaceous deposits of the Achimov formation and the Middle Jurassic deposits of the Tyumen formation. The developed methods enable taking into account the uncertainties associated with variations in the shape and size of the sedimentary bodies and associated lithological barriers as well as the resolution limitations of geophysical research methods - at the level of parameter map sets. The level of detail of the final maps is comparable to the results of full-scale multivariate calculations based on 3D geological models, but the calculation speed is significantly higher, which is relevant for large-scale exploration projects under tight deadlines.
References
1. Dymochkina M.G., Lezhneva V.A., The impact of assessing the probability of geological success on investment decisions (In Russ.), PRONEFT’’. Professional’no o nefti, 2019, No. 4, pp. 14–19, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24887/2587-7399-2019-4-14-19
2. Esiri A., Jambol D., Ozowe C., Enhancing reservoir characterization with integrated analysis and geostatistical methods, Journal of Multidisciplinary sciences, 2024,
No. 7(2), pp. 168-179, DOI: https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0038
3. Modelling and Management Course Manual, Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt-University, 2017, 398 p.
4. Perepletkin I.A., Adaptive algorithm for non-structural traps multivariant calculations while net pay volume probabilistic assessment (In Russ.), PRONEFT’’. Professional’no o nefti, 2025, No. 10(4), pp. 40–51, DOI: https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-10-4-40-51
5. Nezhdanov A.A., Seysmogeologicheskiy analiz neftegazonosnykh otlozheniy Zapadnoy Sibiri dlya tseley prognoza i kartirovaniya neantiklinal’nykh lovushek i zalezhey UV (Seismogeological analysis of oil and gas bearing deposits in Western Siberia for the forecasting and mapping of non-anticlinal traps and hydrocarbon deposits): thesis of doctor of geological and mineralogical science, Tyumen’, 2004.
6. Zavala C., Arcuri M., Intrabasinal and extrabasinal turbidites: origin and distinctive characteristics, Sedimentary Geology, 2016, V. 337, pp. 36–54,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.03.008
7. Prelat A., Covault J.A., Hodson D.M. et al., Intrinsic controls on the range of volumes, morphologies, and dimensions of submarine lobes, Sedimentary Geology, 2010, V. 232, pp. 66–76, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.09.010
8. Shanmugam G., Submarine fans: A critical retrospective (1950–2015), Journal of Paleogeography, 2016, V. 5, No. 2, pp. 110–184, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jop.2015.08.011
9. Alekhin I.I., Perepletkin I.A., Meshcheryakova A.S., A method for structural framework variation of a multilayer field associated with complicated geology (In Russ.), Aktual’nye problemy nefti i gaza, 2024, V. 15, No. 2, pp. 122–140, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29222/ipng.2078-5712.2024-15-2.art2
10. Perepletkin I.A., Zaboeva A.A., Muzraeva B.Yu., Net pay volume probabilistic assessment technique for lithologically screened traps using the example of Achimov deposits in the northern part of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District (In Russ.), Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov = Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2026, V. 337, No. 6, рр. 7 -24.
11. Dubrule O., Geostatistics in petroleum geology, AAPG Continuing Education Course, 1998, 138 p.
12. Devyat’yarov S.S., Bastrakov A.A., Korepanov A.A. et al., Theoretical basis of frac width increasing for the Achimov tight-oil reserves (In Russ.), PRONEFT’’. Professional’no o nefti, 2023, No. 8(4), pp. 160–168, DOI: https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2023-8-4-160-168
13. Rose P.R., Risk analysis and management of petroleum exploration ventures, AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 2001, V. 12, 46 p.,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/Mth12792
14. Jun-Long Liu, Wei Yin, You-Liang Ji et al., Sequence architecture and sedimentary characteristics of a Middle Jurassic incised valley, Western Sichuan depression, China, Petroleum Science, 2018, V. 15, pp. 250–251, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-017-0211-0
15. Viktorova E.M., Zhigulina D.I., Kiselev P.Yu., Klimov V.Yu., New approach to appraise non-structural Tyumen formation traps in the absence of high quality of data
(In Russ.), PRONEFT’’. Professional’no o nefti, 2021, No. 6(3), pp. 43–51, DOI: https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2021-6-3-43-51
16. Abreu V., Sullivan M., Pirmez C., Mohrig D., Lateral accretion packages (LAPs): an important reservoir element in deep-water sinuous channels, Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2003, V. 20, pp. 631–648, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.08.003