Super-viscous oil and natural bitumen of the Permian formations in the Republic of Tatarstan represent a strategic resource of the Russian oil industry. However, their development is impossible without thermal and chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. Typically, performance of EOR methods is assessed by displacement efficiency and dynamic viscosity of the produced fluid, but geochemical properties of the residual oil are studied rarely. The paper presents the results of a comparative study of residual bitumoid in the bituminous sandstone core samples after a set of 13 flow tests using a linear reservoir model, including treatment by saturated and superheated steam, steam in combination with hydrocarbon solvent, carbon dioxide under subcritical conditions, and an aquathermolysis catalyst. Bitumoid was extracted from core samples using organic solvents, and its geochemical properties were determined by SARA-analysis and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The majority of the considered EOR methods yielded a similar reduction in the bitumoid content of the rock, whereas some differences in the alteration of fractional composition were observed. For example, steam treatment results in a shift of the n-alkane series toward high-molecular-weight components, while its combination with the solvent enhances the resin-asphaltene fraction recovery efficiency. Under subcritical conditions, CO2 effectively interacts with cyclic and heteroatomic compounds. Catalytic aquathermolysis demonstrated the best performance and was additionally accompanied by degradation of asphaltenes. The obtained results showed notable differences in the mechanisms of EOR-bitumoid interaction, thus serving as a basis for the optimal selection of EOR technologies considering the initial fluid geochemical properties.
References
1. Yarakhanova D.G., Prospects for the development of heavy oil and natural bitumen by horizontal wells (In Russ.), Georesursy, 2015, V. 1, No. 3(62), pp. 53–56.
2. Nureeva N.S. et al., Aspects of development of extra-heavy oil fields on western slope of South-Tatarian Arch (In Russ.), Territoriya Neftegaz, 2016, No. 10, pp. 64–69.
3. Sitnov S.A. et al., Intensification of thermal steam methods of production of heavy oil using a catalyst based on cobalt (In Russ.), Neftyanoe khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 2016, No. 11, pp. 106–108.
4. Bingfan Li et al., Molecular dynamics simulation of CO2 dissolution in heavy oil resin-asphaltene, Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2019, V. 33, pp. 303–310,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.06.011
5. Safina I.R. et al., Application of the SARA analysis method to characterize oil dispersed systems (In Russ.), Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 2014, V. 17, No. 24, pp. 212–213.
6. Kontorovich A.E., Ratsional’nyy kompleks sovremennykh metodov analiza v organicheskoy geokhimii (Rational complex of modern methods of analysis in organic geochemistry), Collected papers “Sovremennye metody analiza organicheskoy geokhimii” (Modern methods of organic geochemistry analysis), Novosibirsk: Publ. of SNIIGGiMS, 1973, pp. 4–13.
7. Pengcheng Liu et al., Experimental study of the steam distillation mechanism during the steam injection process for heavy oil recovery, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, V. 166, pp. 561–567, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.096
8. Maity S.K., Ancheyta J., Marroquín G., Catalytic aquathermolysis used for viscosity reduction of heavy crude oils: A review, Energy & Fuels, 2010, V. 24, No. 5,
pp. 2809–2816, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef100230k
9. Kudryashov S.I. et al., Catalytic heavy oil upgrading by steam injection with using of transition metals catalysts (In Russ.), Neftyanoe khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 2017, No. 8, pp. 30–34, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2017-8-30-34
10. Patent RU2857881C1, Core holder for bulk reservoir model, Inventors: Lebedev V.N., Aflyatunov R.R., Sotnikov O.S., Khannanov M.T.