History-matched mathematic models and core flooding studies used to improve acid fracturing performance

UDK: 622.276.66
DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2023-9-28-33
Key words: acid fracturing, hydraulic fracture engineering, minifrac test, mathematic modeling, acid composition, fracture conductivity, core flooding experiments, fracture model
Authors: A.A. Lutfullin (PJSC TATNEFT, RF, Almetyvsk), R.F. Khusainov (PJSC TATNEFT, RF, Almetyvsk), R.M. Garifullin (PJSC TATNEFT, RF, Almetyvsk), A.R. Sharifullin (Tetacom OOO, RF, Innopolis), A.Yu. Dmitrieva (TatNIPIneft, RF, Bugulma)

To-date, more than 60% of the world production comes from complex-structure carbonate reservoirs; also, a considerable part of the Volga-Ural petroleum play reserves is in carbonates. Carbonate reservoirs are characterized by a wide range of project recovery factor values, from 0.15 to 0.50. A common technique to improve well performance is acid fracturing. This method can only be used in acid-soluble formation, such as carbonates. A fracturing fluid is injected into the formation under a pressure higher than formation breakdown pressure, which produces a build-up in wellbore pressure leading to fracturing of the rock. Acid is then injected to react with the rock and to etch the surface of the induced fracture. Etching results from non-uniform dissolution of the rock, which, in its turn, is controlled by a number of factors, including variations in permeability and porosity, complex mineral composition (presence of both limestone and dolomites), turbulent flows in the acid-etched fracture. The rough surface of the created fracture is thus the main mechanism to maintain the fracture open during the well life, while in the alternative proppant fracturing, proppant is used to prevent fracture from closing. In acid fracturing, a large number of parameters are used to determine the efficiency of the induced fracture in terms of conductivity, including the amount of the dissolved rock, the etch pattern, the proppant occasionally used to maintain the fracture open. A 3D acid fracturing simulator is an essential tool to predict and to evaluate the acid-etched fracture performance and to safeguard against geological risks.

This paper discusses studies to improve the efficiency of mathematic modeling of acid etching and the use of model studies results for development of tools for acid fracturing engineering in PJSC TATNEFT.

References

1. Nierode D.E., Williams B.B., Characteristics of acid reaction in limestone formations, SPE-3101-PA, 1971, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/3101-PA

2. Roberts L.D., Guin J.A., A new method for predicting acid penetration distance, SPE-5155-PA, 1975, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/5155-PA

3. Lo K.K., Dean R.H., Modeling of acid fracturing, SPE-17110-PA, 1989, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/17110-PA

4. Settari A., Modeling of acid-fracturing treatments, SPE-21870-PA, 1993, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/21870-PA

5. Settari A., Sullivan R.B., Hansen C., A new two-dimensional model for acid-fracturing design, SPE-73002-PA, 2001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/73002-PA

6. Romero J., Gu H., Gulrajani S.N., 3D transport in acid-fracturing treatments: Theoretical development and consequences for hydrocarbon production, SPE-72052-PA, 2001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/72052-PA

7. Mou J., Zhu D., Hill A.D., Acid-etched channels in heterogeneous carbonates—a newly discovered mechanism for creating acid-fracture conductivity, SPE-119619-PA, 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/119619-PA

8. Oeth C.V., Hill A.D., Zhu D., Acid fracture treatment design with three-dimensional simulation, SPE-168602-MS, 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/168602-MS

9. Aljawad M.S., Schwalbert M.P., Zhu D., Hill A.D., Guidelines for optimizing acid fracture design using an integrated acid fracture and productivity model, SPE–191423-18IHFT-MS, 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/191423-18IHFT-MS

10. Aljawad M.S., Zhu D., Hill A.D., Temperature and geometry effects on the fracture surfaces dissolution patterns in acid fracturing, SPE-190819-MS, 2018,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/190819-MS

11. Ugursal A., Schwalbert M.P., Zhu D., Hill A.D., Acid fracturing productivity model for naturally fractured carbonate reservoirs, SPE-191433-18IHFT-MS, 2018,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/191433-18IHFT-MS

12. Alsulaiman M., Aljawad M., Schwalber M. et al., Acid fracture design optimization in naturally fractured carbonate reservoirs, SPE–200619-MS, 2020,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/200619-MS

13. Nierode D.E., Kruk K.F., An evaluation of acid fluid loss additives retarded acids, and acidized fracture conductivity, SPE–4549-MS, 1973,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/4549-MS

14. Meyer B.R., Design formulae for 2-D and 3-D vertical hydraulic fractures: model comparison and parametric studies, SPE–15240-MS, 1986,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/15240-MS

15. Deng J., Mou J., Hill A.D., Zhu D., A new correlation of acid-fracture conductivity subject to closure stress, SPE–140402-MS, 2011,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/140402-MS

16. Cleary M.P., Analysis of mechanisms and procedures for producing favourable shapes of hydraulic fractures, SPE–9260-MS, 1980,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/9260-MS



Attention!
To buy the complete text of article (Russian version a format - PDF) or to read the material which is in open access only the authorized visitors of the website can. .