Mineralogical, geochemical and kinetic characteristics of the Shiranish formation of the Euphrates graben (Syria) and assessment of its oil source potential

UDK: 553.98(569.1
DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2026-5-41-46
Key words: Shiranish formation, Euphrates graben, oil source rocks, organic matter, kerogen, geochemistry, mineralogy, kinetics of oil formation, Syria
Authors: J. Jomaa (Gubkin University, RF, Moscow); S.F. Khafizov (Gubkin University, RF, Moscow)

The Shiranish formation within the central Euphrates graben consists of thick successions of argillites and wackestones enriched in organic carbon. Comprehensive mineralogical, geochemical, and kinetic investigations made it possible to specify the stratigraphic subdivision and to identify the factors controlling the generative potential of these rocks. Based on variations in hydrogen (HI) and oxygen (OI) indices, total organic carbon (TOC) content, and activation energy distributions, the Shiranish formation was divided into lower (LSF) and upper (USF) formations, with the upper member further subdivided into two intervals (USF-1 and USF-2). The USF exhibits higher oil-generating potential (TOC up to 4 %, HI up to 500 mg HC/g TOC) with relatively narrow activation energy distributions, whereas the LSF is characterized by broader activation energy spectra and predominantly gas-generating potential. Mineralogical features, including the presence of ankerite and pyrite, indicate the influence of clay-rich material and significant methanogenesis during early diagenesis. Kinetic modeling revealed differences in predicted maturity temperatures: 136 °C for the USF and 144 °C for the LSF, reflecting facies variations and heterogeneity of the organic matter. These findings provide new insights into the petroleum source rock potential of the Shiranish formation and highlight prospective intervals for future hydrocarbon exploration in the central Euphrates graben.

References

1. Aldahik A., Schulz H.-M., Horsfield B. et al., Crude oil families in the Euphrates Graben (Syria), Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, V. 86, pp. 325–342,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.05.030

2. Yousef I., Morozov V.P., El Kadi M., Alaa A., Tectonic and erosion features, and their influence on zonal distribution of the Upper Triassic and the Lower Cretaceous sediments in the Euphrates Graben area, Syria, Journal of Earth Science (China), 2021, V. 32, No. 9, pp. 1500–1515, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2021-12-3-0541

3. Eremin N.A., Zinovkina I.S., Shabalin N.A., Eremin A.N., Oil and gas possibilities of Syria (In Russ.), Geologiya nefti i gaza, 2017, No. 2, pp. 76–82.

4. Yusef I., Morozov V.P., Kadi M.E., Alaa A., Tectonic and erosion features, and their influence on zonal distribution of the Upper Triassic and the lower cretaceous sediments in the Euphrates graben area, Syria (In Russ.), Geodinamika i tektonofizika = Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 2021, V. 12, No. 3, pp. 608–627,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2021-12-3-0541

5. Abboud M.S., Philp R.P., Allen J., Geochemical correlation of oils and source rocks from central and NE Syria, Petroleum Geology, 2005, V. 28, pp. 203–218,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2005.tb00080.x

6. Alyaseen, M. Kh., Aani Ya., Oil and gas potential of the Euphrates graben in Syria (In Russ.), Neftegazovoe delo, 2019, V. 17, No. 6, pp. 6–14,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17122/ngdelo-2019-6-6-14

7. Barrier E., Machhour L., Blaizot M., Petroleum systems of Syria, In: Petroleum Systems of the Tethyan Region, edited by Robertson A., Searle R., AAPG Special Volumes, 2014, pp. 335–378, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1036/13431862M1063612

8. Tucker M., Wright V., Carbonate sedimentology, Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1990, 308 p.

9. Stephen N.E., Svånå T.A., Swart P.K., Uranium depletion across the Permian–Triassic boundary in Middle East carbonates: Signature of oceanic anoxia, AAPG Bulletin, 2008, V. 92, No. 6, pp. 691–707, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/02140807095

10. Hallam A., Grose J. A., Ruffell A., Paleoclimatic significance of changes in clay mineralogy across the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary in England and France, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1991, V. 81, pp. 173–187.

11. Espitalie J., Laporte J., Madec M., Marquis F., Rapid method for source rock characterization and for evaluating their petroleum potential and their degree of evolution, Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 1977, V. 32, pp. 23–42.

12. Katz B.J., Elrod L.W., Organic geochemistry of DSDP Site 467, offshore California, Middle Miocene to Lower Pliocene strata, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1983, V. 47, pp. 389–396, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(83)90261-2

13. Tissot B.P., Welte D.H., Petroleum formation and occurrence, Berlin: Springer, 1984, 699 p.

14. Schenk H.J., Di Primio R., Horsfield B., The conversion of oil into gas in petroleum reservoirs. Part I: comparative kinetic investigation of gas generation from crude oils of lacustrine, marine and fluviodeltaic origin by programmed-temperature closed system pyrolysis, Organic Geochemistry, 1997, V. 26, No. 7–8, pp. 467–481,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00024-7



Attention!
To buy the complete text of article (Russian version a format - PDF) or to read the material which is in open access only the authorized visitors of the website can. .