The experimental results of oil-pipeline running are presented. The deviations of the experimental results from the quasi-steady model calculations are considered. It’s shown that the head loss in the initial moments of the flow corresponding to the time interval from start of flow to the developed turbulent flow is less than according to the quasi-steady theory.
Key words: hydraulic resistance, unstady flow, pipe-line running, simulation.
References
1. Charnyy I.A. Neustanovivsheesya dvizhenie real'noy zhidkosti v trubakh (Unsteady motion of a real fluid in pipes), Moscow: Nedra Publ., 1975, pp. 186 - 191.
2. Lur'e M.V. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie protsessov truboprovodnogo transporta nefti, nefteproduktov i gaza (Mathematical modeling of pipeline transportation of oil, petrochemicals and gas), Moscow: Neft' i gaz Publ., 2003, 335 p.
3. Shiryaev A.M., Valiev M.I., Kamagaev S.A., Truboprovodnyy transport nefti, 2010, no. 11, pp. 62-63.
4. Lapteva T.I., Mansurov M.N., Neftegazovae delo – Oil and Gas Business, 2006 URL: http://www.ogbus.ru/authors/Lapteva/Lapteva_1.pdf
5. Markov S.B., Izvestiya AN SSSR. Mekhanika zhidkosti i gaza, 1973, no. 2, pp. 65 -74.
6. Kraev V.M., Yanyshev D.S., Vestnik MAI, 2009, V.16, no. 5.
7. Pothof I., A turbulent approach to unsteady friction, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2008, V. 46, no. 5, pp. 679-690.
8. Koppel' T.A., Liyv U.R., Izvestiya AN SSSR. Mekhanika zhidkosti i gaza, 1977, no. 6, pp. 79-85.
