The history of development of the automated construction scheduling tool for conceptual design of oil and gas upstream projects

UDK: 622.276.012:69:681.518
DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2024-11-119-124
Key words: construction scheduling tool, economic efficiency, Ingenix Cost Manager (ICM)
Authors: V.E. Agafonov (Ingenix Group LLC, RF, Moscow); E.A. Dubovitskaya (Ingenix Group LLC, RF, Moscow)

The article deals with the history of development of the automated construction scheduling tool for conceptual design of oil and gas upstream projects by Ingenix Group LLC team. Production start dates have a significant influence on the profitability of a project and are among the main reasons for deterioration of any project efficiency when deviating from the construction plan. In order to provide a correct evaluation of the construction terms at the conceptual design stage it is necessary to determine the duration of design and survey works, the purchase of long-lead equipment and as well as the conclusion of contracts for construction and installation works. Usual lack of sufficient information on a project on its premature stages was considered to be a chief obstacle on the way of development of the automated tool. This automated tool has made it possible to both obtain the distribution of the capital cost within the object construction term and tie different capital objects planned for construction to gain a synchronized construction schedule. Such schedule has become an important link between computation of the cost of capital construction of separate objects and the development of a cashflow profile embedded in the full-scale financial model of oil and gas projects.

References

1. Andreeva N.N., Bugriy O.E., Dubovitskaya E.A. et al., Normativnoe obespechenie proektirovaniya obustroystva mestorozhdeniy uglevodorodov (Regulatory support of the design of oil and gas fields facilities), Moscow: Publ. of Gubkin University, 2015.

2. Chizhikov S.V., Dubovitskaya E.A., Tkachenko M.A., Costs modeling: Support point in a changing world (In Russ.), Neftyanoe khozyaistvo = Oil Industry, 2017, no. 10, pp. 64–68, DOI: http://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2017-10-64-68

3. Chizhikov S.V., Dubovitskaya E.A., Pre-FEED CAPEX evaluation in oil&gas upstream: analyzing effectiveness of integrated technical and economic modelling approach (In Russ.), Neftyanoe khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 2021, no. 4, pp. 10-16, DOI: http://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2021-4-10-16

4. AACE International Recommended Practice № 87R-14: Cost Estimate Classification System – As Applied for the Petroleum Exploration and Production Industry.

5. Trofimov V.V., Ivanov V.N., Kazakov M.K., Upravlenie proektami s Primavera (Project management with Primavera): edited by Trofimov V.V., St. Petersburg: Publ. of SPbGUEF, 2006, 216 p.

6. SN 283-64. Vremennye normy prodolzhitel’nosti proektirovaniya (Temporary standards for design duration), Moscow: Izdatel’stvo literatury po stroitel’stvu Publ., 1964.

7. SNiP 1.04.03-85. Normy prodolzhitel’nosti stroitel’stva i zadela v stroitel’stve predpriyatiy, zdaniy i sooruzheniy: Stroitel’nye normy i pravila (Standards for the duration of construction and the backlog in the construction of enterprises, buildings and structures: Construction standards and regulations), Moscow: Publ. of TsNIIOMTP Gosstroya SSSR, 1991.



Attention!
To buy the complete text of article (Russian version a format - PDF) or to read the material which is in open access only the authorized visitors of the website can. .