When prospecting and exploration for hydrocarbons and the subsequent development of license blocks located in the Arctic waters to prevent colliding iceberg and offshore oil and gas facility is one of the key tasks. The paper presents scientific studies of outlet glaciers of the Novaya Zemlya, Franz Josef Land and Severnaya Zemlya archipelagoes in the area of license blocks of Rosneft Oil Company in the Arctic waters, performed by the Company during 2012-2017.
To build 3D models of the major outlet calving glaciers, the radar ice thickness survey was conducted for three years. In combination with digital elevation models, it allowed to build a three-dimensional model of the object to highlight the glacier transition zone to flotation together with current and potential intensity of iceberg production. The dynamics of glaciers was assessed from satellite remote sensing data. Changes of glacier margins and the ice surface velocity were also determined. Data on the ice flow rate were verified by satellite beacons installed on the main glaciers. The parameters of icebergs distribution produced by a certain glacier were determined by interpretation of satellite imagery directly at the glacier front. The results of interpretation of aerial photo survey of icebergs conducted near glaciers by Rosneft from 2012 to 2017 were also used.
As an example, the paper presents the results for one of the glaciers on Novaya Zemlya - the Vershinsky glacier. The data obtained allow to estimate the ice flux of the glacier into the sea. The glacier velocity data reveals the seasonal variability. Zones of intensive production of icebergs are distinguished on the glacier; the size distribution of produced icebergs is dependent on the structure of this glacier.
1. Kornishin K.A., Tarasov P.A., Efimov Ya.O. et al., Development of corporative Ice Management System for Arctic license blocks (In Russ.), Neftyanoe khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 2017, no. 11, pp. 48–51.
2. C-CORE (2004). Stability and drift of icebergs under tow – Draft report. Prepared for petroleum research NL (PRNL), C-CORE Report R-04-072-216, 2005, V. 1, January.
3. Vasilenko E., Machío F., Lapazaran J. et al., A compact lightweight multipurpose ground-penetrating radar for glaciological applications, Journal of Glaciology, 2011, V. 57, no. 206, pp. 1113–1118.
4. ArcticDEM digital surface model of the Arctic using optical stereo imagery, URL: https://www.pgc.umn.edu/data/arcticdem/
5. Atlas snezhno-ledovykh resursov mira (Atlas of snow and ice resources of the world): edited by Kotlyakov V.M., Moscow, 1997.
6. Leprince S., Ayoub F., Klinger Y., Avouac J.P., Co-Registration of optically sensed images and correlation (COSI-Corr): an operational methodology for ground deformation measurements, Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS 2007), Barcelona, July, 2007.
7. Scherler D., Leprince S., Strecker M.R., Glacier-surface velocities in alpine terrain from optical satellite imagery – Accuracy improvement and quality assessment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, V. 112, no. 10, pp. 3806–3819.
8. Iannacone J.P. Falorni G., Macdonald B., The role of InSAR in detecting and evaluating geotechnical risk from ground deformation, Proceedings of Conference: Risk and Resilience Mining Solutions 2016, Vancouver, Canada, 2016.
9. Proceedings of Scientific seminar on the Importance of Calving for the Mass Balance of Arctic Glaciers (IASC – CWG NAG workshop summary report), 15-17 October 2016, Poland.
10. Willis M.J., Melkonian A.K., Pritchard M.E., Outlet glacier response to the 2012 collapse of the Matusevich Ice Shelf, Severnaya Zemlya, Russian Arctic, J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf., 2015, V. 120, pp. 2040–2055.11. Moholdt G., Heid T., Benham T., Dowdeswell J.A., Dynamic instability of marine-terminating glacier basins of Academy of Sciences Ice Cap, Russian High Arctic, Annals of Glaciology, 2012, V. 53 (60), pp. 193–201.