With the increase in the share of hard-to-recover reserves, the role of high-tech logging methods is increasing, which today are mainly represented by equipment and technologies of foreign manufacturers. Such methods include: logging while drilling (LWD), nuclear magnetic logging (NMR), monopole and cross-dipole acoustic logging, hydrodynamic logging, acoustic and electrical microscanning methods, and others.
The analysis of the competitiveness of domestic logging equipment in comparison with foreign analogues is carried out. The possibility of import substitution of geophysical equipment is considered. By the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that in the domestic market there are only single copies of modern Hi-Tech equipment and logging technologies that can compete with foreign counterparts. A small part of the technologies can be used directly (without modification), and the main part requires further development and improvement to the level of modern requirements for quality and informativeness of special logging methods.
Corporate research and design institutes can play an important role in solving logging equipment development problems, because they possess a significant knowledge base about geological objects, the efficiency of the applied technologies and the problems that need to be addressed. The role of the institutes is to comprehensively analyze various domestic and foreign technologies, choose technologies to substitute for domestic analogues, and formulate technical criteria for developing new technologies that do not have domestic analogues.
Based on the analysis, the paper provides a recommendation on the creation of project management of innovation activities in the development of high-tech geophysical equipment.
References
1. URL: http://www.agbcorp.ru/importozameshenie.html
2. Laptev V.V., Russian geophysical market (In Russ.), Vremya koltyubinga, 2016, no. 3 (057), pp. 12-17.
3. Nazmutdinova S.S., The development of Russian geophysical service based on multi-project management (In Russ.), Naukovedenie, 2014, no. 2.
4. Gubina A.I., Zryachikh E.S., Gulyaev P.N. et al., The results of Russian electric microscanner and foreign analogs on Perm Kama fields compared (In Russ.), Karotazhnik, 2015, V. 256, no. 10, pp. 131–139.
5. Nuclear magnetic resonance comes out of its shell, Oilfield Review, 2008/2009, Winter, V. 20, no. 4, рр. 14–16.
6. MR eXplorer (Magnetic Resonance Logging Service), Baker Hughes, Drilling and Evaluation, 2010, URL: https://www.bakerhughes.com/products-and-services/evaluation/
7. Coates G.R., Xiao L., Prammer M.G., NMR logging principles and applications, Houston, TX: Halliburton Energy Services, 1999, рр. 2–5.
8. Vershinin A.G., Vershinin S.A., Dobrynin S.V., Designing a cross-dipole full-wave sonic logging tool using finite-element modeling (In Russ.), Tekhnologii seysmorazvedki, 2013, no. 1, pp. 87–95.
9. Shubin A.V., Gorodnov A.V., Chernoglazov V.N. et al., The choice of optimal technology of measurement and processing of borehole acoustic data in open and cased wells (In Russ.), Geofizika, 2017, no. 2, pp. 2–13.
10. Dobrynin S.V., The current state of the equipment of cross-dipole acoustic logging in Russia (In Russ.), Geofizicheskiy vestnik, 2014, no. 1, рр. 1–12, URL: http://www.ifz.ru/uploads/media/DobryninCV_annotation.pdf
11. URL: http://www.ids55.ru/nig/articles/normativnayabaza/1629.html
12. Chernykh I.A., Savich A.D., Import-substituting technologies for well logging and downhole operations in oil-and-gas wells of Perm territory (In Russ.), Karotazhnik, 2015, no. (256), pp. 140-149.
13. Tikhonov A., About problem questions of import substitution of software (In Russ.), Neftegazovaya vertikal', 2015, no. 5, pp. 42–45.
